Every state is covered by the federal TCPA, which allows $500 to $1,500 per illegal call. Nearly every state adds its own telemarketing statute, but only some let you sue for fixed extra damages, led by Florida, Oklahoma, Maryland, Washington, Virginia, and North Carolina. Ten states, including Texas and Florida, still keep their own do not call list.
How to read this guide
Federal law sets the floor. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) applies in every state and allows $500 per violation, or up to $1,500 if the violation was willful or knowing. It also says it does not preempt state laws that impose stricter rules on autodialers, prerecorded voices, and telephone solicitations (47 U.S.C. 227(f)(1)). So state laws stack on top of the federal one.
The table below answers three questions for every state and D.C.:
- Statute: the main state telemarketing or robocall law we verified. “Federal rules only” means we found no notable state statute.
- Own do-not-call list: “Yes” means the state still runs a separate sign-up. “Merged with national” means the state list was folded into, or legally adopts, the National Do Not Call Registry. “No” means the state has no list of its own.
- Private lawsuit allowed: whether that state statute lets a consumer sue. “Buyers only” means only someone who bought something through the call can sue. “Unclear” means the only route is the state’s general consumer fraud law, which usually requires a money loss.
States with their own page on this site are linked. Those pages cover calling hours, consent rules, damages, and how to register and complain.
Robocall and telemarketing laws by state
| State | State telemarketing statute | Own do-not-call list | Private lawsuit allowed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Telephone Solicitations, Ala. Code 8-19C-1 et seq.; Alabama Telemarketing Act, 8-19A-1 et seq. | Merged with national | Yes |
| Alaska | AS 45.50.475 | Merged with national | Unclear |
| Arizona | Telephone Solicitations, A.R.S. 44-1271 to 44-1282 | Merged with national | Unclear |
| Arkansas | Consumer Telephone Privacy Act, Ark. Code 4-99-401 et seq. | Merged with national | Unclear |
| California | Bus. & Prof. Code 17590 to 17594; Pub. Util. Code 2871 to 2876 | Merged with national | Yes (limited) |
| Colorado | Colorado No-Call List Act, C.R.S. 6-1-901 to 6-1-908 | Yes | Yes |
| Connecticut | Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-284 to 42-289 (amended by P.A. 23-98) | Merged with national | Unclear |
| Delaware | Delaware Telemarketing Fraud Act, 6 Del. C. 2501A to 2510A | No | Yes (loss or harm required) |
| District of Columbia | Telephone Fraud, D.C. Code 22-3226.01 et seq. | No | Yes (injury required) |
| Florida | Florida Telephone Solicitation Act, Fla. Stat. 501.059 | Yes | Yes |
| Georgia | O.C.G.A. 46-5-27 (no-call); 46-5-23 (robocall devices) | Merged with national | Yes |
| Hawaii | HRS ch. 481P | No | Unclear |
| Idaho | Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act, Idaho Code 48-1001 et seq. | Merged with national | Buyers only |
| Illinois | Automatic Telephone Dialers Act, 815 ILCS 305; Telephone Solicitations Act, 815 ILCS 413 | No | Yes |
| Indiana | Ind. Code 24-4.7; Ind. Code 24-5-14 | Yes | No |
| Iowa | Federal rules only | No | Unclear |
| Kansas | Kansas No-Call Act, K.S.A. 50-670 and 50-670a | Merged with national | Yes |
| Kentucky | KRS 367.46951 to 367.46999 | Merged with national | Yes (caller ID spoofing) |
| Louisiana | Telephone Solicitation Relief Act, La. R.S. 45:844.11 et seq.; La. R.S. 45:810 to 817 | Yes | No |
| Maine | 10 M.R.S. 1498 and 1499-B | Merged with national | Unclear |
| Maryland | Stop the Spam Calls Act, Com. Law 14-4501 to 14-4503; Maryland TCPA, 14-3201 to 14-3202 | No | Yes |
| Massachusetts | M.G.L. c. 159C | Yes | Yes |
| Michigan | MCL 445.111 to 445.111c | Merged with national | Yes |
| Minnesota | Minn. Stat. 325E.26 to 325E.31 | No | Yes |
| Mississippi | Mississippi Telephone Solicitation Act, Miss. Code 77-3-701 et seq. | Merged with national | No |
| Missouri | RSMo 407.1095 to 407.1110; 407.1070 to 407.1085 | Yes | Yes |
| Montana | MCA 30-14-1601 to 30-14-1606; 30-14-1401 et seq. | Merged with national | Yes |
| Nebraska | Neb. Rev. Stat. 86-212 to 86-257 | No | Yes (loss or harm required) |
| Nevada | NRS 228.500 to 228.640; NRS 597.812 to 597.818 | Merged with national | Unclear |
| New Hampshire | RSA ch. 359-E | Merged with national | Yes |
| New Jersey | N.J.S.A. 56:8-119 to 56:8-135 | Merged with national | Unclear |
| New Mexico | NMSA 57-12-22 | Merged with national | Unclear |
| New York | GBL 399-z; GBL 399-p | Merged with national | Yes (prerecorded calls) |
| North Carolina | N.C.G.S. 75-100 to 75-105 | No | Yes |
| North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code ch. 51-28 | Merged with national | Yes |
| Ohio | Ohio Rev. Code ch. 4719 | No | Buyers only |
| Oklahoma | Telephone Solicitation Act of 2022, 15 O.S. 775C.1 to 775C.6 | Yes | Yes |
| Oregon | ORS 646.561 to 646.578 | Merged with national | Yes (loss required) |
| Pennsylvania | Telemarketer Registration Act (Act 147 of 1996, amended by Act 47 of 2026) | Yes | Buyers only |
| Rhode Island | Telephone Sales Solicitation Act, R.I. Gen. Laws 5-61 | No | Buyers only |
| South Carolina | Telephone Privacy Protection Act, S.C. Code 37-21-10 et seq. | Merged with national | Yes |
| South Dakota | SDCL ch. 37-30A; SDCL 49-31-99 to 49-31-108 | Merged with national | Yes (limited) |
| Tennessee | Tenn. Code 65-4-401 et seq. | Yes | No |
| Texas | Tex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 301, 302, 304, 305 | Yes | Yes |
| Utah | Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act, Utah Code 13-25a | Not verified | Yes |
| Vermont | 9 V.S.A. 2464a | Merged with national | Unclear |
| Virginia | Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act, Va. Code 59.1-510 et seq. | No | Yes |
| Washington | RCW 80.36.390; RCW 80.36.400; RCW 19.190 | No | Yes |
| West Virginia | W. Va. Code 46A-6F | No | Yes |
| Wisconsin | Wis. Stat. 100.52 | Merged with national | No |
| Wyoming | Wyo. Stat. 40-12-301 to 40-12-305 | No | No |
We checked each entry against the state’s statute or an official agency page in September 2026. “Not verified” marks the one entry we could not confirm. Laws change; the state pages carry the details and dates.
States with the strongest private claims
A handful of states wrote their own version of the TCPA, sometimes called a mini-TCPA, with fixed damages you can sue for without proving a money loss:
- Florida and Oklahoma require signed written consent for automated sales calls and texts, limit calls to 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., and cap them at three per day per subject. Both allow $500 per violation, up to three times that if willful.
- Maryland added the same kind of rules in its Stop the Spam Calls Act and separately lets consumers collect $500 per call that breaks federal telemarketing rules, plus attorney fees.
- Washington bans recorded sales calls and allows at least $1,000 per violation.
- Virginia and North Carolina use a $500, then $1,000, then $5,000 scale for repeat violations.
- South Carolina allows $1,000 per violation, and up to $5,000 if willful (S.C. Code 37-21-80).
- Georgia, Missouri, Massachusetts, Montana, and Alabama allow up to a few thousand dollars per knowing violation once a caller has broken the rules more than once in 12 months.
States that still keep their own do not call list
Most states now rely on the federal registry. Ten still run a separate list: Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas. In most of them, the state list also pulls in state numbers from the federal registry, but not the other way around. Register on both. The federal list is what supports a TCPA lawsuit, so see our guide to the federal do not call rule.
What changed in 2025 and 2026
- Texas: SB 140, effective September 1, 2025, extended the telephone seller law to texts and added deceptive trade practice remedies to the no-call and TCPA-mirror chapters.
- Virginia: from January 1, 2026, replying STOP to a sales text is a do-not-contact request that must be honored for at least 10 years.
- Washington: a 2026 law cut damages for unsolicited commercial texts to $100 for suits filed on or after June 11, 2026.
- Pennsylvania: Act 47 of 2026 brings texts under the state law, moves calling hours to 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., bans Sunday calls, and requires written consent for robocalls once it takes effect in October 2026.
What to do next
Find your state in the table. If it has its own page, read it for the exact rules, then keep a record of each call with our call log template. In most states the federal TCPA claim is the one worth the most, so the TCPA overview is the next stop. If you are unsure whether your calls are worth pursuing, a free case review can look at both the state and federal claims together.
Frequently asked questions
Which states have their own do not call list?
Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas still run separate state lists. Most other states have merged their lists into the National Do Not Call Registry or never had one.
Can state robocall laws give me more than the TCPA?
Yes, in some states. The TCPA does not preempt stricter state rules, so a single call can support both a federal claim and a state claim. Courts generally will not let you recover twice for the same harm, but state laws can add fees, higher per-call amounts, or rules the TCPA lacks.
What is a mini-TCPA?
A state law modeled on the federal TCPA that sets its own consent, calling hour, and call-frequency rules and lets consumers sue for fixed damages. Florida’s Telephone Solicitation Act and Oklahoma’s Telephone Solicitation Act of 2022 are two examples.
Do I need to register on my state’s list if I am on the national registry?
In states that still keep their own list, yes. Some of those lists import federal registrations automatically and some do not, and the timing rules differ. Registration is free in the states we checked, including Colorado, Missouri, Oklahoma, Massachusetts, and Texas (online).
Sources
- 47 U.S.C. 227 (Cornell LII)
- Fla. Stat. 501.059 (Florida Legislature)
- 15 O.S. 775C.6 (OSCN)
- Md. Com. Law 14-3202 (Maryland General Assembly)
- RCW 80.36.390 (Washington Legislature)
- Va. Code 59.1-515 (Virginia Law Library)
- N.C.G.S. 75-105 (NC General Assembly)
- Texas SB 140 (2025), enrolled text
- Pennsylvania Act 47 of 2026 (Pa. General Assembly)
- RCW 19.190.040 (Washington Legislature)
- Colorado PUC: Colorado No-Call List
- Indiana AG: Do Not Call
- Missouri AG: No-Call
- Oklahoma AG: Telemarketer Restriction Act registry
- Pennsylvania AG: Do Not Call List
- Mass.gov: Do Not Call Registry for Residents and Businesses
- Texas No Call
- FDACS: Florida Do Not Call
- Ala. Code 8-19C-7 (Alabama Legislature)
- AS 45.50.475 (FindLaw)
- A.R.S. 44-1278 (Arizona Legislature)
- Arkansas AG: Do Not Call and telemarketing
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17593 (California Legislature)
- Conn. Gen. Stat. ch. 743m (Connecticut General Assembly)
- 6 Del. C. ch. 25A (Delaware Code)
- D.C. Code 22-3226.11 (D.C. Council)
- Hawaii OCP: Do Not Call Registry
- Idaho Code 48-1003A (Idaho Legislature)
- Iowa AG: Unwanted calls and spoofing
- K.S.A. 50-670a (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)
- La. R.S. 45:844.12 (Louisiana Legislature)
- 10 M.R.S. 1499-B (Maine Legislature)
- Minn. Stat. 325E.31 (Minnesota Revisor)
- Mississippi HB 1225 (2023), as sent to the Governor
- MCA 30-14-1605 (Montana Legislature)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 86-233 (Nebraska Legislature)
- Nevada AG: Nevada Do Not Call Registry
- RSA ch. 359-E (New Hampshire General Court)
- New Jersey Do Not Call fact sheet
- NMSA 57-12-22 (FindLaw)
- N.D. Cent. Code ch. 51-28 (North Dakota Legislature)
- Ohio Rev. Code ch. 4719
- ORS ch. 646 (Oregon Legislature)
- R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 5-61 (Rhode Island Legislature)
- S.C. Code Title 37, ch. 21 (South Carolina Legislature)
- SDCL 37-30A-14 (South Dakota Legislature)
- Tennessee PUC: Do Not Call/Text Program
- Utah Code 13-25a (FindLaw)
- 9 V.S.A. 2464a (Vermont Legislature)
- W. Va. Code 46A-6F-701 (West Virginia Legislature)
- Wyo. Stat. Title 40 (Wyoming Legislature)