Illegal robocalls and spam texts can be worth $500 to $1,500 each.Free case review: (917) 551-6690

News

One-to-One Consent Rule Struck Down: What the Eleventh Circuit Ruling Means for Lead Form Calls

Short answer

The FCC’s one-to-one consent rule would have required a separate consent for each seller before telemarketing robocalls or robotexts. On January 24, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit vacated it in Insurance Marketing Coalition v. FCC, and the FCC formally removed it effective August 29, 2025. Written consent is still required, but one web form can still cover several sellers.

What the court decided on January 24, 2025

In December 2023 the FCC adopted new consent rules aimed at lead generation websites (FCC 23-107, adopted December 13, 2023). Those are the sites that ask for your phone number in exchange for a quote, then pass it to many companies. The rules had two parts. First, a consumer could consent to telemarketing robocalls or robotexts from only one seller at a time. Second, the calls had to be “logically and topically associated with the interaction that prompted the consent.” The change to 47 C.F.R. 64.1200(f)(9) was set to take effect January 27, 2025.

It never did. On January 24, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC, No. 24-10277. Judge Branch wrote for a panel that also included Judges Luck and Lagoa. The court held “that the FCC exceeded its statutory authority under the TCPA because the 2023 Order’s new consent restrictions impermissibly conflict with the ordinary statutory meaning of ‘prior express consent.'” It vacated that part of the order.

How the court defined consent

The court looked at the plain meaning of the words Congress used. Its test: “to give ‘prior express consent’ to receive a robocall, one need only ‘clearly and unmistakably’ state, before receiving the robocall, that he is willing to receive the robocall.” The court added, “One-to-one consent is not required.”

The court was also blunt about the second requirement. It wrote that “what ‘logically and topically associated’ means is anyone’s guess.”

That definition still has teeth. Consent has to be clear, it has to come before the call, and it has to be given voluntarily. The court described express consent as consent “that is clearly and unmistakably stated.” A buried line in fine print may not meet that bar, and a caller who cannot prove it had consent has a problem.

What the FCC did next

The FCC moved quickly. On the same day as the ruling, its Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau postponed the rule by order DA 25-90. The court’s mandate issued on April 30, 2025. On July 14, 2025, the FCC released order DA 25-621, which repealed the revised version of section 64.1200(f)(9) and restored the version that existed before. That change was published in the Federal Register at 90 FR 42137 and took effect August 29, 2025.

Date Event
Dec. 13, 2023 FCC adopts one-to-one consent rule (FCC 23-107)
Jan. 24, 2025 Eleventh Circuit vacates the rule; FCC postpones it (DA 25-90)
Jan. 27, 2025 Original effective date, which never took effect
Apr. 30, 2025 Court’s mandate issues
July 14, 2025 FCC repeals the revised rule (DA 25-621)
Aug. 29, 2025 Repeal takes effect (90 FR 42137)

What this means if you get calls after filling out a form

You have probably seen this. You ask one website for an insurance or solar quote, and within an hour several companies call or text. The one-to-one rule would have made that harder. With the rule gone, a single form can still list many sellers, and each one may claim you agreed to hear from it.

Claiming consent and proving it are different things. For telemarketing robocalls and robotexts, the seller still needs prior express written consent under the restored rule. Our page on prior express written consent explains what a valid signed agreement has to say. If the company cannot produce a record showing you clearly agreed to calls from that specific company, its consent defense may fail.

Look closely at who called. A company you never heard of, calling about something unrelated to the site you visited, is a common pattern in these cases. So are calls that begin after you gave a number on a sweepstakes or coupon page. Callers in health insurance and solar marketing often rely on lead forms.

You can also end any consent you gave. Since April 11, 2025, callers must honor an opt-out made by any reasonable method within ten business days. Our guide to revoking consent to calls and texts covers the words that count.

What to do if a lead form started the calls

Write down the website you used and the date, if you remember them. Save every text and note every call, including the company name each caller gave. Then reply STOP to texts and tell live callers to stop. Calls that continue after that are usually the strongest part of a case, because consent no longer covers them.

If a company says you consented, ask it for the record: the website, the date, the time and the consent language. You are entitled to see what they are relying on before you accept it. If the calls kept coming after you said stop, a free case review can tell you whether the consent they claim would hold up.

Frequently asked questions

Is the FCC one-to-one consent rule in effect?

No. The Eleventh Circuit vacated it on January 24, 2025 before it took effect, and the FCC removed it from its rules effective August 29, 2025. The earlier version of 47 C.F.R. 64.1200(f)(9) was restored.

Can one website give my number to many companies?

After the ruling, a single consent form can name more than one seller. Each seller still needs to show you clearly and unmistakably agreed, before the call, to receive robocalls or robotexts from it.

Do I still have a claim if I filled out an online form?

Possibly. The caller has to prove valid consent, and many cannot produce a record tied to their company. Calls after you told them to stop are generally not covered by any earlier consent.

Does this ruling affect live telemarketing calls to my Do Not Call number?

The ruling dealt with consent for robocalls and robotexts. Do Not Call Registry rules for telephone solicitations remain in place, and calls to a registered number still need permission or another exemption.

Sources

  1. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC, No. 24-10277 (Jan. 24, 2025)
  2. FCC Order DA 25-90 postponing the one-to-one consent rule (Jan. 24, 2025)
  3. FCC Order DA 25-621 repealing revised 47 CFR 64.1200(f)(9) (July 14, 2025)
  4. Federal Register, 90 FR 42137 (Aug. 29, 2025), Delete, Delete, Delete: Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages
  5. Federal Register, 89 FR 5098 (Jan. 26, 2024), FCC 23-107 final rule

Free case review

Getting calls or texts you never agreed to?

Tell us who is calling and how often. Every submission is reviewed. If you can't name the company yet, the form will show you how to find out.

  • No fee unless you recover
  • Nationwide, through co-counsel where needed
  • Takes about 2 minutes

Or call (917) 551-6690

Do You Qualify?

Illegal calls and texts can be worth $500 to $1,500 each. Three quick steps, about a minute.

Step 1 of 3: What is happening

What are you getting? Choose all that apply
Which phone do they reach? Choose all that apply
Do you know the name of the company?

Prefer to talk? Call (917) 551-6690

Call (917) 551-6690